Traditional Healers and Global Surveillance Strategies for Emerging Diseases: Closing the Gap
1996

Traditional Healers and Global Surveillance Strategies for Emerging Diseases

Commentary

Author Information

Author(s): Nora Ellen Groce, Mary Elizabeth Reeve

Primary Institution: Yale School of Public Health

Hypothesis

Including traditional healers in global surveillance networks can improve the early identification and reporting of emerging infectious diseases.

Conclusion

Integrating traditional healers into global disease reporting systems is essential for timely identification and response to new and reemerging infectious diseases.

Supporting Evidence

  • Traditional healers are often the first health specialists to see patients with new diseases.
  • Many communities rely on traditional healers for medical care due to limited access to modern healthcare.
  • Effective communication between traditional healers and local health systems is crucial for disease surveillance.

Takeaway

Traditional healers are often the first to see new diseases, so we need to include them in our disease tracking systems to help keep everyone safe.

Potential Biases

Potential bias may arise from the differing perspectives between traditional healers and modern medical practitioners.

Limitations

The commentary does not provide empirical data or specific case studies to support its claims.

Participant Demographics

The commentary discusses traditional healers from various cultural backgrounds, particularly in remote and developing areas.

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication