A laboratory and in-ward evaluation of cholesterol assays on the Ames Seralyzer
1985
Evaluation of Cholesterol Assays on the Ames Seralyzer
publication
Evidence: low
Author Information
Author(s): L. M. Nelson, et al.
Hypothesis
Can cholesterol assays be performed with clinical advantage close to the patient using the Ames Seralyzer?
Conclusion
The Ames Seralyzer is unsuitable for cholesterol assays due to imprecision and inaccuracy, except for initial detection of hypercholesterolemia.
Supporting Evidence
- The laboratory evaluation showed satisfactory linearity but unsatisfactory imprecision and inaccuracy.
- The performance by junior doctors was significantly worse than laboratory results.
- The instrument is considered unsuitable for routine cholesterol assays.
Takeaway
The Ames Seralyzer was tested to see if it could quickly check cholesterol levels near patients, but it didn't work well enough.
Methodology
Laboratory and in-ward evaluation of cholesterol assays using the Ames Seralyzer.
Limitations
The performance of the Ames Seralyzer was significantly worse when used by junior doctors compared to laboratory standards.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website