Interviews with Directors of Organizations Supporting Research Evidence in Health Policy
Author Information
Author(s): Lavis John N, Oxman Andrew D, Moynihan Ray, Paulsen Elizabeth J
Primary Institution: McMaster University
Hypothesis
What are the experiences of organizations that produce clinical practice guidelines and support the use of research evidence in health policy?
Conclusion
The study provides a rich description of organizations supporting the use of research evidence, highlighting the importance of collaboration and strong links with policymakers.
Supporting Evidence
- Using rigorous methods was the most commonly cited strength among organizations.
- Organizations producing clinical practice guidelines focused on weaknesses in implementation.
- Directors emphasized the importance of collaboration and strong links with policymakers.
Takeaway
The study talked to leaders of organizations that help make health policies based on research, showing that working together and staying connected with decision-makers is really important.
Methodology
The study used purposive sampling to interview directors from various organizations, focusing on their experiences and insights.
Potential Biases
There may be a social desirability bias in responses as organizations might have wanted to present themselves positively.
Limitations
The study had a bias towards high-income countries and may have social desirability bias in responses.
Participant Demographics
Participants included directors from organizations in Western Europe, North America, Asia, Latin America, Africa, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Australia.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website