Comparing Two Dressings for Skin Graft Donor Sites
Author Information
Author(s): Muangman Pornprom, Nitimonton Sooksan, Aramwit Pornanong
Primary Institution: Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Hypothesis
The study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of Bactigras and Telfa AMD dressings for managing donor-site wounds.
Conclusion
The Telfa AMD dressing leads to faster healing and less pain compared to the Bactigras dressing.
Supporting Evidence
- The Telfa AMD dressing resulted in a significantly shorter re-epithelialization time.
- Patients using Telfa AMD reported lower pain scores compared to those using Bactigras.
- There was no significant difference in treatment costs between the two dressings.
- Both dressings were easy to apply and did not require special supplies.
- One case of infection was noted in the Bactigras group, while no infections occurred in the Telfa AMD group.
Takeaway
This study found that one type of bandage helps wounds heal faster and hurts less than another type.
Methodology
A prospective, randomized control study comparing two dressings on 32 patients with split-thickness skin grafts.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the open-label design of the study.
Limitations
The study was limited to a single center and may not be generalizable to all populations.
Participant Demographics
32 patients, aged 16-78, with 22 men and 10 women.
Statistical Information
P-Value
<0.001
Statistical Significance
p<0.001
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website