Public and Expert Opinions on Neuroimaging Uses
Author Information
Author(s): Wardlaw Joanna M., O'Connell Garret, Shuler Kirsten, DeWilde Janet, Haley Jane, Escobar Oliver, Murray Shaun, Rae Robert, Jarvie Donald, Sandercock Peter, Schafer Burkhard
Primary Institution: University of Edinburgh
Hypothesis
What do the public and experts think about the current uses and regulation of neuroimaging?
Conclusion
The study found that both the public and experts are skeptical about non-medical uses of neuroimaging, with significant concerns about data privacy and the need for regulation.
Supporting Evidence
- 660 individuals responded to the public survey and 303 to the expert survey.
- Public respondents expressed skepticism about neuroimaging for lie detection and marketing.
- Experts underestimated the frequency of neuroimaging used as evidence in court.
- Both groups agreed on the importance of better public education regarding neuroimaging.
Takeaway
People are worried about how brain scans might be used, especially for things like job interviews or marketing, and they want better rules to protect their privacy.
Methodology
The study used electronic surveys to gather opinions from the public and neuroimaging experts, analyzing responses with descriptive statistics.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to self-selection of survey respondents and the lack of engagement from experts with the media.
Limitations
The study did not seek ethics approval and may not represent all demographics accurately.
Participant Demographics
Public respondents were mostly aged 26-40, with a majority being professionals; expert respondents included neuroscientists and psychologists.
Statistical Information
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website