Cancer Risk Communication in Newspapers
Author Information
Author(s): Stryker Jo Ellen, Fishman Jessica, Emmons Karen M., Viswanath Kasisomayajula
Primary Institution: Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
Hypothesis
How do cancer risks differ in communication between mainstream and ethnic newspapers?
Conclusion
Cancer risks are often communicated poorly in both mainstream and ethnic newspapers, with few stories presenting optimal risk communication.
Supporting Evidence
- Only 19% of stories presented cancer risks optimally.
- Ethnic newspapers were more likely to discuss demographic risks.
- Mainstream newspapers discussed medical risks more than ethnic newspapers.
Takeaway
This study looked at how newspapers talk about cancer risks. It found that most stories don't explain the risks clearly, which can confuse people.
Methodology
Content analysis of cancer news coverage from 2003 in mainstream and ethnic newspapers.
Potential Biases
Differences in publication frequency and regional differences may have influenced results.
Limitations
The study only analyzed print newspapers and did not consider other media formats.
Participant Demographics
Mainstream and ethnic newspapers, including various racial and ethnic groups.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Confidence Interval
95%
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website