Cancer Risk Communication in Mainstream and Ethnic Newspapers
2009

Cancer Risk Communication in Newspapers

Sample size: 5930 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Stryker Jo Ellen, Fishman Jessica, Emmons Karen M., Viswanath Kasisomayajula

Primary Institution: Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University

Hypothesis

How do cancer risks differ in communication between mainstream and ethnic newspapers?

Conclusion

Cancer risks are often communicated poorly in both mainstream and ethnic newspapers, with few stories presenting optimal risk communication.

Supporting Evidence

  • Only 19% of stories presented cancer risks optimally.
  • Ethnic newspapers were more likely to discuss demographic risks.
  • Mainstream newspapers discussed medical risks more than ethnic newspapers.

Takeaway

This study looked at how newspapers talk about cancer risks. It found that most stories don't explain the risks clearly, which can confuse people.

Methodology

Content analysis of cancer news coverage from 2003 in mainstream and ethnic newspapers.

Potential Biases

Differences in publication frequency and regional differences may have influenced results.

Limitations

The study only analyzed print newspapers and did not consider other media formats.

Participant Demographics

Mainstream and ethnic newspapers, including various racial and ethnic groups.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

95%

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication