A scoping review of research on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and the mass media: Looking back, moving forward
2008

Research on Complementary and Alternative Medicine and the Media

Sample size: 16 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Weeks Laura C, Strudsholm Tina

Primary Institution: University of Calgary

Hypothesis

What is the scope and nature of research on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and its representation in the mass media?

Conclusion

Future research on CAM and the mass media should be collaborative and involve multiple disciplines to address the complexities of media representation.

Supporting Evidence

  • Of 4,454 studies identified, only 16 were relevant to the research objectives.
  • Media coverage of CAM is generally positive, with 58% of articles containing positive portrayals.
  • Most articles focused on print media, with little attention to television or radio.

Takeaway

This study looked at how often and in what ways the media talks about alternative medicine, finding that most coverage is positive but often lacks discussion of risks.

Methodology

A scoping review was conducted, involving searching for studies, selecting based on criteria, extracting data, and summarizing results.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to reliance on conventional sources over CAM sources in media reporting.

Limitations

The review included only 16 articles, which limits comprehensiveness, and excluded non-English publications and Internet-based research.

Participant Demographics

The media coverage primarily focused on audiences in Western developed countries, particularly the UK, US, and Canada.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6882-8-43

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication