Public, Animal, and Environmental Health Implications of Aquaculture
1997

Public, Animal, and Environmental Health Implications of Aquaculture

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): E. Spencer Garrett, Carlos Lima dos Santos, Michael L. Jahncke

Primary Institution: National Seafood Inspection Laboratory, Pascagoula, Mississippi, USA

Hypothesis

How can aquaculture practices be improved to ensure public and environmental health?

Conclusion

Aquaculture can be safe and beneficial, but it requires better management and understanding of health risks.

Supporting Evidence

  • Aquaculture contributes significantly to the U.S. seafood supply.
  • More than half of U.S. seafood consumption relies on imported stock.
  • Public health risks associated with aquaculture include disease transmission and contamination.
  • Application of HACCP principles has shown promise in controlling health risks in aquaculture.

Takeaway

Aquaculture is like farming fish, and we need to make sure it's done safely so it doesn't hurt people or the environment.

Methodology

The study discusses various health risks associated with aquaculture and suggests improvements in management practices.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in reporting due to reliance on existing literature and expert opinions.

Limitations

The study does not provide specific quantitative data or experimental results.

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication