Low-Dose Response Extrapolation for Environmental Health Risk Assessment
Author Information
Author(s): Ronald H. White, Ila Cote, Lauren Zeise, Mary Fox, Francesca Dominici, Thomas A. Burke, Paul D. White, Dale B. Hattis, Jonathan M. Samet
Primary Institution: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Hypothesis
How can low-dose extrapolation models be improved for environmental health risk assessments?
Conclusion
The workshop identified the need for improved methods in low-dose extrapolation to better assess health risks from environmental pollutants.
Supporting Evidence
- Advancements in statistical methods have improved the evaluation of health risks from environmental pollutants.
- The workshop emphasized the importance of understanding mode of action in risk assessment.
- Participants proposed new approaches for low-dose extrapolation that consider uncertainty and variability.
Takeaway
Scientists are trying to figure out how to better understand the risks of small amounts of pollution on our health.
Methodology
Experts reviewed literature and discussed low-dose extrapolation methods in a workshop setting.
Potential Biases
Potential biases may arise from the reliance on animal data to infer human health risks.
Limitations
The current understanding of biological responses to chemicals is limited, making it difficult to develop precise models.
Participant Demographics
Participants included experts from toxicology, biostatistics, human biology, epidemiology, and risk assessment.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website