Exploring Patient Perspectives in HIV Treatment Adherence
Author Information
Author(s): Candy Bridget, King Michael, Jones Louise, Oliver Sandy
Primary Institution: University College London
Hypothesis
Can integrating qualitative evidence on patients' perspectives improve understanding of adherence to HIV treatment?
Conclusion
The study found that effective interventions for HIV treatment adherence often align more closely with patients' concerns.
Supporting Evidence
- Effective interventions contained a broader range of components that addressed barriers to adherence.
- Interventions that matched patient recommendations were more likely to improve adherence.
- Qualitative evidence can provide insights into why some interventions are more effective than others.
Takeaway
This study looked at how patients feel about their HIV treatment and found that when treatments match what patients care about, they are more likely to stick to them.
Methodology
The study used a matrix to compare qualitative evidence from patient perspectives with data from a Cochrane review on HIV treatment adherence.
Potential Biases
There is a risk of bias due to incomplete reporting in trial reports and subjective evaluation of matches between qualitative and quantitative data.
Limitations
The conclusions drawn are tentative due to the methodological weaknesses of the trials included.
Participant Demographics
Participants were HIV/AIDS patients, with a total sample size of 916 from the qualitative review.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website