Analyzing Tissue Specificity of Human Genes and Proteins
Author Information
Author(s): Emig Dorothea, Kacprowski Tim, Albrecht Mario
Primary Institution: Max Planck Institute for Informatics
Hypothesis
How do different measurement techniques affect the detection of tissue-specific genes and proteins?
Conclusion
RNA-sequencing is more sensitive than microarrays for detecting gene expression, revealing more widely expressed genes than previously thought.
Supporting Evidence
- RNA-sequencing detects more genes than microarrays.
- Microarrays may miss low-expressed genes.
- Tissue specificity findings may need to be re-evaluated.
Takeaway
This study shows that different methods for measuring gene expression can find different results, and RNA-sequencing is better at finding genes that are not expressed very much.
Methodology
The study analyzed microarray and RNA-sequencing data to compare the detection of tissue-specific genes and proteins.
Potential Biases
Previous findings based on microarrays may be biased towards highly expressed genes.
Limitations
The study relies on existing datasets, which may not fully represent current gene expression technologies.
Participant Demographics
Human tissues and cell lines were used in the analysis.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.05
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website