Multiple Method Contraception Use among African American Adolescents in Four US Cities
2011

Contraceptive Practices among African American Adolescents

Sample size: 850 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Jennifer L. Brown, Michael Hennessy, Jessica M. Sales, Ralph J. DiClemente, Laura F. Salazar, Peter A. Vanable, Michael P. Carey, Daniel Romer, Robert F. Valois, Larry K. Brown, Bonita Stanton

Primary Institution: Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University

Hypothesis

What are the contraceptive practices and methods used by African American adolescents during their last sexual encounter?

Conclusion

The study found that many adolescents used less effective contraceptive methods, often believing they could identify safe partners, which led to risky sexual behaviors.

Supporting Evidence

  • 40% of adolescents reported using dual or multiple contraceptive methods.
  • 35 different contraceptive combinations were reported by the participants.
  • Female gender was a predictor of hormonal birth control use and less effective methods.

Takeaway

Many teenagers think they can tell if their partners are safe, so they don't always use condoms or other birth control, which can lead to unplanned pregnancies and STDs.

Methodology

The study used a longitudinal intervention design with a randomized controlled trial to assess contraceptive use among adolescents.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in self-reported data regarding contraceptive use and partner risk assessment.

Limitations

The study did not assess the consistency or proper use of reported contraceptive methods and results may not generalize to youth from larger cities or rural areas.

Participant Demographics

Participants were African American adolescents aged 14 to 17, with a majority living in low-income urban areas.

Statistical Information

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1155/2011/765917

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication