Predominance of HIV-1 Subtype A and D Infections in Uganda
2000

Predominance of HIV-1 Subtype A and D Infections in Uganda

Sample size: 200 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Dale J. Hu, James Baggs, Robert G. Downing, Danuta Pieniazek, Jonathan Dorn, Carol Fridlund, Benon Biryahwaho, Sylvester D.K. Sempala, Mark A. Rayfield, Timothy J. Dondero, Renu Lal

Primary Institution: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Hypothesis

The primary objective of our study was to characterize the recent virus isolates of the HIV-1 epidemic in Uganda by describing the distribution and genetic diversity of the principal HIV-1 subtypes.

Conclusion

The study found that the distribution and genetic diversity of HIV-1 subtypes A and D in Uganda have not changed appreciably over a three-year period.

Supporting Evidence

  • 49% of specimens were classified as env subtype A.
  • 48% of specimens were classified as env subtype D.
  • 2.5% of specimens were classified as env subtype C.
  • The demographic characteristics of persons infected with subtypes A and D were very similar.
  • The proportion of either subtype did not differ significantly between early and later periods.
  • Mean pairwise intrasubtype nucleotide divergence for env gp41 was 7.8% for subtype A and 7.2% for subtype D.

Takeaway

Researchers looked at blood samples from people with HIV in Uganda and found that two main types of the virus, A and D, have been around for a long time and are very similar.

Methodology

The study involved collecting and characterizing 200 HIV-1 specimens from different clinical sites in Uganda using sequence-based phylogenetic analysis.

Potential Biases

A systematic selection bias with respect to subtype appears unlikely due to independent data collection.

Limitations

The sample was collected cross-sectionally without known dates of infection, and the sample size was not large enough to document small changes in subtype proportions.

Participant Demographics

{"age":{"median":{"subtype_A":30.0,"subtype_D":28.0},"mean":{"subtype_A":31.2,"subtype_D":30.8}},"sex":{"female":{"subtype_A":66,"subtype_D":73},"male":{"subtype_A":34,"subtype_D":27}},"marital_status":{"married":{"subtype_A":37,"subtype_D":40},"single_divorced_widowed":{"subtype_A":63,"subtype_D":60}}}

Statistical Information

P-Value

p=0.47

Statistical Significance

p=0.47

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication