Factors Influencing Contraceptive Use in Adolescent Women with Psychological Disorders
Author Information
Author(s): Delia L. Lang, Jessica M. Sales, Laura F. Salazar, Ralph J. DiClemente, Richard A. Crosby, Larry K. Brown, Geri R. Donenberg
Primary Institution: Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
Hypothesis
What individual, interpersonal, and environmental factors predict multimethod contraceptive use among sexually active adolescent women diagnosed with psychological disorders?
Conclusion
The study found that self-efficacy, multiple partners, pregnancy history, parental communication, parental norms about sex, and neighborhood cohesion significantly predict multimethod contraceptive use.
Supporting Evidence
- 34.7% of participants reported multimethod contraceptive use in the past three months.
- Self-efficacy for condom use was positively associated with multimethod use.
- Adolescents with multiple partners were more likely to use multiple contraceptive methods.
- Positive parental norms about sex increased the likelihood of multimethod use.
- Neighborhood cohesion was linked to higher rates of multimethod contraceptive use.
Takeaway
This study looked at why some teenage girls use more than one type of birth control, finding that things like confidence in using condoms and talking to parents about sex can make a difference.
Methodology
The study analyzed data from 288 sexually active adolescent women using a multivariable logistic regression model to identify predictors of multimethod contraceptive use.
Potential Biases
Self-reporting may lead to social desirability bias affecting the accuracy of reported contraceptive use.
Limitations
The findings may not be generalizable beyond the specific sample and geographic regions, and data were self-reported, which could introduce bias.
Participant Demographics
Participants were adolescent women aged 13-18, with a diverse racial and ethnic background, and many from low-income families.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.004
Confidence Interval
1.02–1.12
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website